XDAT vs. GXPT
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XDAT is actively managed, while GXPT is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
XDAT vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 17.81% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -4.38%
- 1Y
- -7.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- -1.38%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 17.81%
- 6M
- 21.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDAT vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -5.68% | -3.60% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 17.81% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and GXPT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDAT vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -18.74% | -36.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.09% | -7.98% | -13.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.85% | -5.02% | -20.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.06% | — | — |
Volatility
XDAT vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.29% | 22.57% | +1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.54% | 22.57% | +6.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.45% | 22.57% | +6.88% |
XDAT vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and GXPT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer