XDAT vs. WCBR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. XDAT is actively managed, while WCBR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDAT returned -1.82%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for WCBR. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WCBR.

Performance

XDAT vs. WCBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than WCBR's 38.04% return.

XDAT

• 1D: 3.70%
• 1M: 3.05%
• 6M: 9.55%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 1Y: -2.03%
• 3Y*: 11.37%
• 5Y*: -1.82%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.44%

WCBR

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 45.67%
• YTD: 38.04%
• 1Y: 27.65%
• 3Y*: 24.81%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	$2.26M	$1.99M	$1.49M
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	$42.52K	$24.92K	$17.00K

XDAT vs. WCBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	-0.52%	1.87%	16.54%	45.77%	-45.71%	11.86%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	38.04%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-41.96%	7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and WCBR is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021	0.88

The correlation between XDAT and WCBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDAT vs. WCBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDAT	WCBR
Technology	65.2%	100.0%
Communication Services	28.9%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Healthcare	2.6%	-
Financial Services	2.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XDAT vs. WCBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDAT

XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 10
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 10
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 10

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 30
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDAT vs. WCBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDAT	WCBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	0.81	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	1.27	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.16	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	0.93	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.14	2.09	-2.22

XDAT vs. WCBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the WCBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAT and WCBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. WCBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than WCBR's maximum drawdown of -52.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and WCBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDAT	WCBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.87%	-52.25%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.56%	-29.92%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.56%	-30.27%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.87%	-52.25%	-2.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.77%	-4.94%	-11.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.73%	-19.96%	-5.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.89%	13.27%	+1.62%

Volatility

XDAT vs. WCBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) is 7.45%, while WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that XDAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDAT	WCBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	11.32%	-3.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.83%	29.53%	-8.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.26%	34.51%	-9.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.69%	34.10%	-4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.37%	33.67%	-4.30%

XDAT vs. WCBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WCBR's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDAT vs. WCBR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDAT nor WCBR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDAT and WCBR in my portfolio?

XDAT and WCBR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XDAT or WCBR?

WCBR has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to XDAT (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs WCBR's -52.25%.

Which ETF is better, XDAT or WCBR?

On 5-year performance, WCBR leads with 8.16% vs -1.82% for XDAT. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XDAT has been the lower-risk option at 7.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XDAT or WCBR?

Over the 5-year period, WCBR has performed better with a 8.16% return vs -1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDAT or WCBR?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDAT or WCBR?

XDAT and WCBR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XDAT and WCBR?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.45% for WCBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WCBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.