PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDAT vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 9.54% return.


XDAT

1D
-3.31%
1M
10.82%
YTD
0.92%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
-1.19%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*

JEPQ

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.31%
YTD
9.54%
6M
9.75%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
0.92%1.87%16.54%45.77%-24.54%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
9.54%15.18%24.85%36.28%-12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XDAT and JEPQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.79

The correlation between XDAT and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDAT
JEPQ

Technology

53.3%
54.0%

Communication Services

35.1%
15.4%

Real Estate

5.7%
0.2%

Financial Services

4.1%
0.4%

Healthcare

2.6%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
12.8%

Industrials

0.5%
3.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.1%

Energy

-

0.4%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Technology

XDAT
53.3%
JEPQ
54.0%

Communication Services

XDAT
35.1%
JEPQ
15.4%

Real Estate

XDAT
5.7%
JEPQ
0.2%

Financial Services

XDAT
4.1%
JEPQ
0.4%

Healthcare

XDAT
2.6%
JEPQ
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XDAT
1.3%
JEPQ
12.8%

Industrials

XDAT
0.5%
JEPQ
3.1%

Basic Materials

XDAT

-

JEPQ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

XDAT

-

JEPQ
7.1%

Energy

XDAT

-

JEPQ
0.4%

Utilities

XDAT

-

JEPQ
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDAT vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDAT
XDAT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDATJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.49

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

3.31

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

16.22

-16.31

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDAT and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDATJEPQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

2.49

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

1.00

-0.97

Drawdowns

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDATJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.87%

-20.07%

-34.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.56%

-8.82%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.56%

-20.07%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.57%

-0.10%

-15.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-3.42%

-22.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.78%

1.79%

+11.99%

Volatility

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDATJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

1.26%

+7.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

9.07%

+10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

11.73%

+11.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.45%

16.61%

+12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.43%

16.61%

+12.82%

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDAT vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.07%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
0.00%0.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDAT and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDAT has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.92% vs 12.16% for XDAT. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.92% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.

XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDAT and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer