XDAT vs. JEPQ
XDAT (Franklin Exponential Data ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. XDAT is actively managed, while JEPQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDAT returned 11.37%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for JEPQ. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XDAT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDAT achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.51% return.
XDAT
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- -1.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.44%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $489.18M | $434.68M | $428.59M | |
| $42.52K | $24.92K | $17.00K |
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | -0.52% | 1.87% | 16.54% | 45.77% | -22.45% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.51% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDAT and JEPQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XDAT and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDAT
JEPQ
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XDAT
JEPQ
Communication Services
XDAT
JEPQ
Real Estate
XDAT
JEPQ
Healthcare
XDAT
JEPQ
Financial Services
XDAT
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
XDAT
JEPQ
Industrials
XDAT
JEPQ
Basic Materials
XDAT
-
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
XDAT
-
JEPQ
Energy
XDAT
-
JEPQ
Utilities
XDAT
-
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDAT vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
XDAT
JEPQ
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDAT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.28 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.42 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 9.91 | -10.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDAT drawdown since its inception was -54.87%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDAT and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDAT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.87% | -20.07% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -8.82% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -20.07% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.77% | -2.91% | -13.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -3.38% | -22.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.89% | 2.15% | +12.74% |
Volatility
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Exponential Data ETF (XDAT) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 6.14%. This indicates that XDAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDAT | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 6.14% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.83% | 12.20% | +8.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.26% | 14.64% | +10.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 16.90% | +12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 16.90% | +12.47% |
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDAT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDAT vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
XDAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 11.18% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% |
XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDAT and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDAT has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to JEPQ (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDAT dropped -54.87% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 18.60% vs 11.37% for XDAT. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XDAT.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.18%, compared with 0.00% for XDAT.
XDAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XDAT and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XDAT and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer