PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHG vs. YEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCHG vs. YEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than YEAR's 1.11% return.


XCHG

1D
-2.14%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
5.48%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YEAR

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.41%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHG vs. YEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XCHG
AB US Equity ETF
5.48%0.30%
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
1.11%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHG and YEAR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCHG vs. YEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHG

YEAR
YEAR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
YEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
YEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
YEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
YEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHG vs. YEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XCHG vs. YEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHGYEARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

4.25

-3.29

Drawdowns

XCHG vs. YEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, which is greater than YEAR's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and YEAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHGYEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-0.61%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-0.12%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-0.06%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

Volatility

XCHG vs. YEAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCHGYEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

0.78%

+12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.44%

1.15%

+12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.44%

1.15%

+12.29%

XCHG vs. YEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than YEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCHG vs. YEAR - Dividend Comparison

XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than YEAR's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XCHG
AB US Equity ETF
0.22%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
4.15%4.33%5.16%5.00%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCHG and YEAR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YEAR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YEAR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.

YEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.22% for XCHG.

XCHG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while YEAR is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.25% for YEAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCHG and YEAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer