XCHG vs. HIDV
XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCHG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while HIDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.
Performance
XCHG vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than HIDV's 10.96% return.
XCHG
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCHG vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 6.97% | 0.30% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 10.96% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHG and HIDV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHG vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank
XCHG
HIDV
XCHG vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCHG | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.62 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
XCHG vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and HIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHG | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -18.76% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.95% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -2.05% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
XCHG vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHG | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 11.91% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 14.52% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 14.52% | -1.40% |
XCHG vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHG vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison
XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than HIDV's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 0.22% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XCHG and HIDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.22% for XCHG.
XCHG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.45% for HIDV.
Find the right allocation for XCHG and HIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer