PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHG vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCHG vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


XCHG

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.97%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHG vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XCHG
AB US Equity ETF
6.97%0.30%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
32.04%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHG and AFOS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCHG vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XCHG vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHGAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

4.35

-3.08

Drawdowns

XCHG vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHGAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-11.52%

+1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.29%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-1.37%

-0.51%

Volatility

XCHG vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCHGAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

20.19%

-7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.12%

20.19%

-7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.12%

20.19%

-7.07%

XCHG vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCHG vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, which matches AFOS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%
XCHG
AB US Equity ETF
0.22%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCHG and AFOS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.

XCHG and AFOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.22%.

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCHG and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer