YEAR vs. FLOT
YEAR (AB Ultra Short Income ETF) and FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. YEAR is actively managed, while FLOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, YEAR returned 4.94%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for FLOT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YEAR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLOT.
Performance
YEAR vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YEAR achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 2.03% return.
YEAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
YEAR vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YEAR AB Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.22% | 4.69% | 5.41% | 5.85% | 1.07% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 2.03% | 4.91% | 6.53% | 6.43% | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between YEAR and FLOT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YEAR vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank
YEAR
FLOT
YEAR vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YEAR | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.10 | 3.15 | -1.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.17 | 11.13 | +5.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 69.73 | 103.02 | -33.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YEAR vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YEAR drawdown since its inception was -0.64%, smaller than the maximum FLOT drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YEAR and FLOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YEAR | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -13.54% | +12.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.23% | -0.43% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.43% | -1.57% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.21% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Volatility
YEAR vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison
AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) has a higher volatility of 0.28% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.21%. This indicates that YEAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YEAR | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 0.21% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.54% | 0.63% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 0.75% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 1.78% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 4.15% | -3.00% |
YEAR vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
YEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
YEAR vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison
YEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than FLOT's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
YEAR AB Ultra Short Income ETF | 4.14% | 4.33% | 5.16% | 5.00% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YEAR and FLOT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YEAR has higher volatility (0.28%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YEAR dropped -0.64% vs FLOT's -13.54%.
On 3-year performance, FLOT leads with 5.60% vs 4.94% for YEAR. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 5.60% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for YEAR.
FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 4.14% for YEAR.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for YEAR and 0.15% for FLOT.
FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.42 vs 4.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YEAR and FLOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer