XCHG vs. LRGC

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for LRGC.

Performance

XCHG vs. LRGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XCHG having a 5.48% return and LRGC slightly higher at 5.67%.

XCHG

• 1D: -2.14%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRGC

• 1D: -2.42%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHG vs. LRGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XCHG AB US Equity ETF	5.48%	0.30%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	5.67%	0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHG and LRGC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.98

Return for Risk

XCHG vs. LRGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 53
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHG vs. LRGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCHG	LRGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.39	-0.43

Drawdowns

XCHG vs. LRGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum LRGC drawdown of -19.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and LRGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCHG	LRGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-19.38%	+9.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-2.42%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-2.15%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XCHG	LRGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.44%	12.15%	+1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.44%	15.26%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.44%	15.26%	-1.82%

XCHG vs. LRGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGC's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCHG vs. LRGC - Dividend Comparison

XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than LRGC's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.55%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%
XCHG AB US Equity ETF	0.22%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCHG and LRGC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, XCHG and LRGC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XCHG or LRGC?

On fees, LRGC is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCHG or LRGC?

LRGC is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCHG or LRGC?

LRGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.22% for XCHG.

What is the main difference between XCHG and LRGC?

Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.48% for LRGC.