XCHG vs. DJUN
XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - XCHG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while DJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. XCHG is actively managed, while DJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJUN.
Performance
XCHG vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 4.39% return.
XCHG
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DJUN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26M | $1.81M | $2.13M | |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | $55.08K | $59.91K | $74.54K |
XCHG vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 8.51% | 0.38% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 4.39% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHG and DJUN is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHG vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank
XCHG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DJUN
XCHG vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCHG | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCHG vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum DJUN drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and DJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHG | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -11.96% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.35% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -1.56% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility
XCHG vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHG | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.06% | 4.74% | +8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 8.54% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 7.99% | +5.07% |
XCHG vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHG vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison
XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 0.37% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCHG and DJUN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.
XCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.
XCHG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.85% for DJUN.
Find the right allocation for XCHG and DJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer