PortfoliosLab logo
YEAR vs. CSHI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between YEAR and CSHI is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

YEAR vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

YEAR:

0.97%

CSHI:

1.01%

Max Drawdown

YEAR:

-0.12%

CSHI:

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

YEAR:

-0.10%

CSHI:

0.00%

Returns By Period


YEAR

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CSHI

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YEAR vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

YEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

YEAR vs. CSHI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YEAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YEAR is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YEAR is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YEAR is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YEAR is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YEAR is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YEAR is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CSHI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSHI is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSHI is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSHI is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSHI is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSHI is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSHI is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

YEAR vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

YEAR vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

YEAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than CSHI's 5.46% yield.


TTM202420232022
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
4.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSHI
Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF
5.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

YEAR vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YEAR drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YEAR and CSHI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

YEAR vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...