YEAR vs. BIL

In the year-to-date period, YEAR achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.48% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

YEAR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current YEAR Sharpe Ratio is 5.03, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 20.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YEAR and BIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

YEAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%.

The maximum YEAR drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum BIL drawdown of -0.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YEAR and BIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

AB Ultra Short Income ETF (YEAR) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that YEAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.