XCHG vs. GXLC
XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. XCHG is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
XCHG vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 10.06% return.
XCHG
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GXLC
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.98K | $20.23K | $17.31K | |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | $55.08K | $59.91K | $74.54K |
XCHG vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 8.51% | 0.38% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 10.06% | 0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHG and GXLC is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHG vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCHG vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHG | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -9.08% | -0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.48% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -1.58% | -0.19% |
Volatility
XCHG vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHG | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.06% | 13.60% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 13.60% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 13.60% | -0.54% |
XCHG vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHG vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than GXLC's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.64% | 0.30% |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 0.37% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XCHG and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.37% for XCHG.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for XCHG and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer