PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLC vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLC vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 26.02% return.


GXLC

1D
-2.61%
1M
0.60%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-4.70%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
26.02%
6M
29.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
8.50%3.22%
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
26.02%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLC and AFOS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLC vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXLC vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXLCAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

3.75

-2.44

Drawdowns

GXLC vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLCAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-11.52%

+2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-4.83%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-1.38%

-0.12%

Volatility

GXLC vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLCAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

20.74%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

20.74%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

20.74%

-7.11%

GXLC vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXLC vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than AFOS's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.24%0.30%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.64%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXLC and AFOS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.24% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLC and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer