GXLC vs. AFOS
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GXLC is passively managed, while AFOS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
GXLC vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 31.85% return.
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 13.22%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 21.43%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 1Y
- 68.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 70.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $534.27K | $476.43K | $469.20K | |
| $13.68K | $22.15K | $18.83K |
GXLC vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 13.47% | 3.22% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 31.85% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and AFOS is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFOS
GXLC vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXLC | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 21.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -11.80% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -3.61% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.82% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
GXLC vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 23.23% | -9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 22.40% | -8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 22.40% | -8.69% |
GXLC vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXLC vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.88% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLC and AFOS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer