GXLC vs. RAUS
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and RAUS (RACWI US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index while RAUS tracks the RACWI US Index. Both are passively managed. Their 1.00 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for RAUS.
Performance
GXLC vs. RAUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly lower than RAUS's 14.35% return.
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 13.22%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RAUS
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.68K | $22.15K | $18.83K | |
RAUS RACWI US ETF | $122.40K | $208.39K | $248.93K |
GXLC vs. RAUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 13.47% | 3.22% |
RAUS RACWI US ETF | 14.35% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and RAUS is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. RAUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and RACWI US ETF (RAUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. RAUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, which is greater than RAUS's maximum drawdown of -8.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and RAUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | RAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -8.63% | -0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.11% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.32% | -0.24% |
Volatility
GXLC vs. RAUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | RAUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 13.01% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 13.01% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 13.01% | +0.70% |
GXLC vs. RAUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than RAUS's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXLC vs. RAUS - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than RAUS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.88% | 0.30% |
RAUS RACWI US ETF | 0.22% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, GXLC and RAUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, RAUS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAUS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.02% for GXLC.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.22% for RAUS.
GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, while RAUS tracks RACWI US Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.00% for RAUS.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and RAUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer