GXLC vs. ACEP
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GXLC is passively managed, while ACEP is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.
Performance
GXLC vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than ACEP's 23.04% return.
GXLC
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACEP
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 23.04%
- 6M
- 23.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 10.27% | 4.88% |
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 23.04% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and ACEP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and ACEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -7.06% | -2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -1.73% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -1.48% | -0.05% |
Volatility
GXLC vs. ACEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 17.79% | -3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 17.79% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 17.79% | -3.97% |
GXLC vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXLC vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.63% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLC and ACEP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACEP.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.45% for ACEP.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and ACEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer