XBFR vs. QFLR
XBFR (Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.
Performance
XBFR vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBFR
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFLR
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBFR vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 4.18% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBFR and QFLR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBFR vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank
XBFR
QFLR
XBFR vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBFR | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 1.22 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
XBFR vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and QFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBFR | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -13.97% | +9.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -4.16% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -2.50% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
XBFR vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBFR | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 11.87% | -3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 12.83% | -4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 12.83% | -4.83% |
XBFR vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBFR vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison
XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBFR and QFLR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBFR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBFR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.
XBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.
XBFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBFR and 0.89% for QFLR.
Find the right allocation for XBFR and QFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer