PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFLR vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.85% return.


QFLR

1D
-2.77%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
3.27%
6M
2.61%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JEPQ

1D
-2.48%
1M
0.34%
YTD
7.85%
6M
7.02%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
3.27%17.27%16.30%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.85%15.18%20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QFLR and JEPQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.93

The correlation between QFLR and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFLR vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QFLRJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.86

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

13.55

-2.71

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFLRJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-20.07%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-8.82%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-2.48%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-3.40%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.86%

+0.06%

Volatility

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 6.27%. This indicates that QFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFLRJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

6.27%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

10.58%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

13.08%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

16.79%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.13%

16.79%

-3.66%

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFLR vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.22%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, QFLR and JEPQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QFLR has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to JEPQ (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFLR dropped -13.97% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 1-year performance, JEPQ leads with 25.10% vs 20.74% for QFLR. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 25.10% return vs 20.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.22%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for QFLR and 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFLR and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer