QFLR vs. SFLR

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than SFLR's -0.56% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both QFLR and SFLR have an expense ratio of 0.89%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and SFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SFLR's 0.42% yield.

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and SFLR.

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) is 2.32%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that QFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.