QFLR vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 0.90% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than VOO's 1.29% yield.

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and VOO.

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) is 2.32%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that QFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.