PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBFR vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBFR vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBFR

1D
-2.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFLR

1D
-2.45%
1M
1.58%
YTD
3.59%
6M
3.63%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBFR vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBFR and SFLR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBFR vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBFR

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBFR vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBFR vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBFRSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.63

+0.33

Drawdowns

XBFR vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and SFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBFRSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-12.13%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-2.45%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-1.74%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

Volatility

XBFR vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBFRSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

9.26%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.00%

10.23%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.00%

10.23%

-2.23%

XBFR vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBFR vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SFLR's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.33%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%
XBFR
Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF
0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XBFR and SFLR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XBFR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBFR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.03% for XBFR.

XBFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBFR and 0.89% for SFLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBFR and SFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer