PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBFR vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBFR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBFR

1D
-2.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-5.25%
1M
6.30%
YTD
14.63%
6M
23.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBFR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBFR and NVDO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBFR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBFR vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBFRNVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.08

+0.89

Drawdowns

XBFR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBFRNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-16.25%

+12.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-6.14%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-4.97%

+3.97%

Volatility

XBFR vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBFRNVDODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

32.39%

-24.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.00%

32.39%

-24.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.00%

32.39%

-24.39%

XBFR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBFR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than NVDO's 14.53% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XBFR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBFR.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.53%, compared with 0.03% for XBFR.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBFR and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBFR and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer