PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFLR vs. PHEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than PHEQ's 5.11% return.


QFLR

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
3.09%
6M
2.26%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PHEQ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
5.11%
6M
4.53%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
3.09%17.27%16.30%
PHEQ
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF
5.11%11.76%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between QFLR and PHEQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.71

The correlation between QFLR and PHEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFLR vs. PHEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PHEQ
PHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QFLRPHEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.44

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.26

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

14.76

-4.70

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the PHEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and PHEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, which is greater than PHEQ's maximum drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and PHEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFLRPHEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-12.55%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-4.26%

-3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

-0.78%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-0.98%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

0.94%

+0.99%

Volatility

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) at 1.70%. This indicates that QFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFLRPHEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

1.70%

+4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

4.79%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

6.13%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.12%

8.59%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.12%

8.59%

+4.53%

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PHEQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFLR vs. PHEQ - Dividend Comparison

QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM202520242023
PHEQ
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF
0.95%1.19%1.39%1.73%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFLR and PHEQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QFLR has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to PHEQ (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFLR dropped -13.97% vs PHEQ's -12.55%.

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 19.39% vs 13.85% for PHEQ. On fees, PHEQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 19.39% return vs 13.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHEQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

PHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

QFLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PHEQ is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for QFLR and 0.29% for PHEQ.

PHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFLR and PHEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer