XBFR vs. BAPR
XBFR (Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. XBFR is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
XBFR vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBFR
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
XBFR vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 4.18% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBFR and BAPR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBFR vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
XBFR
BAPR
XBFR vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF (XBFR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBFR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 0.82 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
XBFR vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBFR drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBFR and BAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBFR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -23.91% | +19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | -1.05% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -2.59% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility
XBFR vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBFR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 5.73% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 11.49% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 13.12% | -5.12% |
XBFR vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XBFR and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
XBFR vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
XBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% |
XBFR Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBFR and BAPR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBFR and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
XBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.
Find the right allocation for XBFR and BAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer