WZRD vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

WZRD vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -68.20% return, which is significantly lower than PSCX's 4.28% return.

WZRD

• 1D: -16.84%
• 1M: -25.64%
• YTD: -68.20%
• 6M: -72.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 14.90%
• 3Y*: 12.50%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WZRD vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	-68.20%	-10.73%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	4.28%	8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and PSCX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

WZRD vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WZRD vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WZRD	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.39	1.25	-2.63

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -74.18%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WZRD	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.18%	-10.20%	-63.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.18%	-0.92%	-73.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.71%	-1.86%	-21.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WZRD	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.27%	5.61%	+47.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.27%	7.08%	+46.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.27%	6.97%	+46.30%

WZRD vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WZRD vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	4.05%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WZRD and PSCX in my portfolio?

WZRD and PSCX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WZRD or PSCX?

On fees, PSCX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WZRD or PSCX?

PSCX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WZRD or PSCX?

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between WZRD and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.75% for PSCX.