PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCX vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCX vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 22.50% return.


PSCX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.79%
6M
5.38%
YTD
5.97%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.64%

CALF

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.89%
6M
19.77%
YTD
22.50%
1Y
39.59%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.38M$24.48M$25.33M
$30.18K$20.77K$40.17K

PSCX vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
5.97%12.08%13.27%16.57%-7.35%9.03%0.43%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
22.50%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCX and CALF is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020

0.61

The correlation between PSCX and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSCX vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCX
CALF

Technology

38.5%
23.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

9.9%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
23.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
11.6%

Industrials

8.4%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
5.3%

Energy

3.0%
13.7%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.2%

Technology

PSCX
38.5%
CALF
23.4%

Financial Services

PSCX
11.6%
CALF
0.2%

Communication Services

PSCX
9.9%
CALF
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCX
9.5%
CALF
23.2%

Healthcare

PSCX
8.9%
CALF
11.6%

Industrials

PSCX
8.4%
CALF
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSCX
4.5%
CALF
5.3%

Energy

PSCX
3.0%
CALF
13.7%

Utilities

PSCX
2.2%
CALF

-

Real Estate

PSCX
1.8%
CALF
1.8%

Basic Materials

PSCX
1.7%
CALF
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCX vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSCX vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCXCALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

6.13

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.53

17.68

-3.15

PSCX vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCX and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCX vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCXCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-47.58%

+37.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-6.02%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

-34.22%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

-34.22%

+24.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.88%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-10.57%

+8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

2.09%

-1.24%

Volatility

PSCX vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 1.55%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCXCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

5.09%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

11.64%

-7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

16.13%

-10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

23.23%

-16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

25.89%

-18.95%

PSCX vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCX vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
1.12%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCX and CALF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to PSCX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 5-year performance, PSCX leads with 8.41% vs 6.29% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSCX has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

PSCX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CALF is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.59% for CALF.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCX and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer