PSCX vs. FTAG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while FTAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Agriculture Index. PSCX is actively managed, while FTAG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCX returned 8.41%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for FTAG. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PSCX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FTAG.

Performance

PSCX vs. FTAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than FTAG's 11.55% return.

PSCX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 1Y: 13.16%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.64%

FTAG

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: 3.82%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 1Y: 13.22%
• 3Y*: 2.62%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: 5.40%
• ALL TIME*: -8.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	$71.78K	$63.89K	$178.26K
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	$30.18K	$20.77K	$40.17K

PSCX vs. FTAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.97%	12.08%	13.27%	16.57%	-7.35%	9.03%	0.43%
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	11.55%	14.82%	-6.72%	-7.28%	-4.52%	17.31%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCX and FTAG is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020	0.49

The correlation between PSCX and FTAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSCX vs. FTAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCX	FTAG
Technology	38.5%	-
Financial Services	11.6%	-
Communication Services	9.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	4.5%
Healthcare	8.9%	10.0%
Industrials	8.4%	25.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	7.6%
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	52.5%

Return for Risk

PSCX vs. FTAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FTAG

FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 33
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSCX vs. FTAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSCX	FTAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	0.83	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	1.27	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.15	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	1.24	+1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.53	2.74	+11.80

PSCX vs. FTAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the FTAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCX and FTAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSCX vs. FTAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum FTAG drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and FTAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCX	FTAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-90.89%	+80.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-9.56%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.61%	-20.74%	+11.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.20%	-32.77%	+22.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-78.42%	+78.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-71.30%	+69.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	4.33%	-3.48%

Volatility

PSCX vs. FTAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 1.55%, while First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCX	FTAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.55%	4.15%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.63%	11.27%	-6.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.75%	14.31%	-8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.14%	17.42%	-10.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.94%	19.44%	-12.50%

PSCX vs. FTAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTAG's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCX vs. FTAG - Dividend Comparison

PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF	1.30%	1.39%	2.89%	3.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.72%	2.33%	2.16%	1.26%	0.61%	1.35%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCX and FTAG in my portfolio?

PSCX and FTAG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCX or FTAG?

FTAG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to PSCX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs FTAG's -90.89%.

Which ETF is better, PSCX or FTAG?

On 5-year performance, PSCX leads with 8.41% vs 1.86% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCX or FTAG?

Over the 5-year period, PSCX has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCX or FTAG?

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCX or FTAG?

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between PSCX and FTAG?

PSCX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FTAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.70% for FTAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.