WZRD vs. MTUM
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WZRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Opportunistic Trader, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
WZRD vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -61.76% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 22.55% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -15.05%
- YTD
- -61.76%
- 6M
- -65.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 22.55%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
WZRD vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -61.76% | -10.73% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 22.55% | 6.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and MTUM is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
MTUM
WZRD vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WZRD | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.35 | 0.81 | -2.16 |
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -71.81%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.81% | -34.08% | -37.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.95% | -6.99% | -61.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -6.21% | -17.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 20.03% | +30.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 20.77% | +29.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 21.12% | +29.50% |
WZRD vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than MTUM's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.64% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 3.37% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and MTUM have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 0.64% for MTUM.
WZRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer