PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 15.78%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 14.86% annualized return.


MTUM

1D
-1.33%
1M
-7.19%
6M
17.90%
YTD
21.02%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
28.36%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.78%
ALL TIME*
15.71%

SPY

1D
0.02%
1M
1.39%
6M
7.26%
YTD
8.96%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
14.86%
ALL TIME*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$633.57M$610.76M$507.00M
$33.26B$34.73B$38.70B

MTUM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
21.02%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.96%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and SPY is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.86

The correlation between MTUM and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

MTUM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTUM
SPY

Technology

48.0%
38.4%

Industrials

15.3%
8.3%

Energy

11.3%
3.4%

Financial Services

5.2%
12.1%

Communication Services

4.9%
9.2%

Healthcare

4.0%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
8.8%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.9%

Utilities

0.6%
2.3%

Technology

MTUM
48.0%
SPY
38.4%

Industrials

MTUM
15.3%
SPY
8.3%

Energy

MTUM
11.3%
SPY
3.4%

Financial Services

MTUM
5.2%
SPY
12.1%

Communication Services

MTUM
4.9%
SPY
9.2%

Healthcare

MTUM
4.0%
SPY
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.9%
SPY
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
3.0%
SPY
8.8%

Basic Materials

MTUM
2.1%
SPY
1.7%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.5%
SPY
1.9%

Utilities

MTUM
0.6%
SPY
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.95

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

8.40

-1.75

MTUM vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-55.19%

+21.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-8.88%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-18.76%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-24.50%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-33.72%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.42%

-2.45%

-9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-9.02%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

2.06%

+1.89%

Volatility

MTUM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.28%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.05%

3.28%

+7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.24%

9.88%

+12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

12.70%

+11.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

17.15%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

17.94%

+3.67%

MTUM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTUM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SPY's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and SPY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (11.05%) compared to SPY (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.78% vs 14.86% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while SPY is S&P 500. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer