PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MTUM vs. QUAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MTUM vs. QUAL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while QUAL is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 15.78%/yr vs 14.16%/yr for QUAL. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

MTUM vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 20.80% return, which is significantly higher than QUAL's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed QUAL with an annualized return of 15.78%, while QUAL has yielded a comparatively lower 14.16% annualized return.

MTUM

1D
0.73%
1M
-4.66%
6M
17.04%
YTD
20.80%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
28.96%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
15.78%
ALL TIME*
15.67%

QUAL

1D
1.10%
1M
1.52%
6M
9.27%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
14.16%
ALL TIME*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
$578.91M$630.18M$548.65M

QUAL

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
$217.13M$238.90M$384.89M

MTUM vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF		20.80%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		12.08%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and QUAL is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2013

0.83

The correlation between MTUM and QUAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MTUM vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MTUM
QUAL

Technology

48.3%
40.2%

Industrials

12.1%
7.4%

Energy

11.5%
2.9%

Financial Services

5.2%
10.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
10.3%

Healthcare

4.2%
9.2%

Utilities

3.7%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
9.0%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.7%

Technology

MTUM
48.3%
QUAL
40.2%

Industrials

MTUM
12.1%
QUAL
7.4%

Energy

MTUM
11.5%
QUAL
2.9%

Financial Services

MTUM
5.2%
QUAL
10.9%

Communication Services

MTUM
4.4%
QUAL
10.3%

Healthcare

MTUM
4.2%
QUAL
9.2%

Utilities

MTUM
3.7%
QUAL
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.7%
QUAL
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
3.0%
QUAL
9.0%

Basic Materials

MTUM
2.2%
QUAL
1.9%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.5%
QUAL
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

Often compared with MTUM:
MTUM vs. SPMOMTUM vs. SPYMTUM vs. QQQMTUM vs. VFMOMTUM vs. VOOMTUM vs. QMOMMTUM vs. IDMO
Often compared with QUAL:
QUAL vs. SPHQQUAL vs. SPYQUAL vs. USMVQUAL vs. VOOQUAL vs. IVVQUAL vs. SCHDQUAL vs. GARP

Return for Risk

MTUM vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTUM vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MTUMQUALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.07
1.86

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.55
2.63

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.53

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

11.33

-5.20

MTUM vs. QUAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the QUAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and QUAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and QUAL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MTUMQUALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-34.06%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-9.03%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-18.00%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-28.23%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-34.06%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.58%

0.00%

-12.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-4.07%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

2.01%

+2.45%

Volatility

MTUM vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 3.07%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MTUMQUALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

3.07%

+7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.24%

9.70%

+13.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.57%

12.33%

+13.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.89%

17.39%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

18.10%

+3.63%

MTUM vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MTUM and QUAL have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MTUM vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than QUAL's 0.85% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF		0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF		0.85%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

MTUM and QUAL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to QUAL (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs QUAL's -34.06%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.78% vs 14.16% for QUAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 14.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM and QUAL have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while QUAL is Quality Factor. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and QUAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer