WZRD vs. FNDX
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WZRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. WZRD is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Over the past year, WZRD returned -96.34% vs 32.35% for FNDX. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
WZRD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -95.64% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 17.56% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- -24.11%
- 1M
- -66.67%
- 6M
- -94.79%
- YTD
- -95.64%
- 1Y
- -96.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -95.20%
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 17.56%
- 1Y
- 32.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $79.55M | $81.34M | $109.11M | |
| $53.22K | $31.27K | $34.05K |
WZRD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -95.64% | -18.13% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 17.56% | 13.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and FNDX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
FNDX
WZRD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WZRD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.54 | 1.56 | -1.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 5.07 | -6.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.09 | 20.26 | -22.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -37.72% | -58.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.46% | -6.06% | -90.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.46% | -0.41% | -96.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -3.52% | -29.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.06% | 1.52% | +44.54% |
Volatility
WZRD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) has a higher volatility of 70.52% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.37%. This indicates that WZRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 70.52% | 2.37% | +68.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.00% | 7.34% | +91.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.72% | 10.32% | +86.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.69% | 15.08% | +77.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.69% | 17.44% | +75.25% |
WZRD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.54%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 29.54% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and FNDX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WZRD has higher volatility (70.52%) compared to FNDX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WZRD dropped -96.46% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 1-year performance, FNDX leads with 32.35% vs -96.34% for WZRD. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 32.35% return vs -96.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 29.54%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.
WZRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer