WZRD vs. FNDX
WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WZRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Opportunistic Trader, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
WZRD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -61.76% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.
WZRD
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -15.05%
- YTD
- -61.76%
- 6M
- -65.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 33.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
WZRD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | -61.76% | -10.73% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 15.35% | 13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between WZRD and FNDX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WZRD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
WZRD
FNDX
WZRD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WZRD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.35 | 0.80 | -2.14 |
Drawdowns
WZRD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -71.81%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WZRD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.81% | -37.72% | -34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.95% | 0.00% | -68.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -3.55% | -19.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
WZRD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WZRD | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.62% | 10.22% | +40.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 15.18% | +35.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 17.50% | +33.12% |
WZRD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WZRD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than FNDX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF | 3.37% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WZRD and FNDX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.
WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.44% for FNDX.
WZRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for WZRD and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer