PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WZRD vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WZRD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -61.76% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.


WZRD

1D
-1.41%
1M
-15.05%
YTD
-61.76%
6M
-65.77%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
0.68%
1M
3.54%
YTD
15.35%
6M
15.57%
1Y
33.72%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WZRD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WZRD
Opportunistic Trader ETF
-61.76%-10.73%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
15.35%13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and FNDX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WZRD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WZRD

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WZRD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WZRD vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WZRDFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.35

0.80

-2.14

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -71.81%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WZRDFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.81%

-37.72%

-34.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.95%

0.00%

-68.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-3.55%

-19.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

Volatility

WZRD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WZRDFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.62%

10.22%

+40.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.62%

15.18%

+35.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.62%

17.50%

+33.12%

WZRD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

WZRD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than FNDX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.44%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
WZRD
Opportunistic Trader ETF
3.37%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WZRD and FNDX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.44% for FNDX.

WZRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.25% for FNDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WZRD and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer