PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDX vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 14.28%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


FNDX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.39%
YTD
14.72%
6M
15.53%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
14.28%

SCHX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.43%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.84%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.72%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
11.50%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and SCHX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.91

The correlation between FNDX and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDX vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDX
SCHX

Technology

19.1%
37.5%

Financial Services

14.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.4%

Energy

10.3%
3.4%

Communication Services

10.1%
10.3%

Industrials

9.3%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.8%

Utilities

3.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

FNDX
19.1%
SCHX
37.5%

Financial Services

FNDX
14.1%
SCHX
9.9%

Healthcare

FNDX
12.0%
SCHX
8.4%

Energy

FNDX
10.3%
SCHX
3.4%

Communication Services

FNDX
10.1%
SCHX
10.3%

Industrials

FNDX
9.3%
SCHX
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDX
9.2%
SCHX
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

FNDX
7.4%
SCHX
4.5%

Basic Materials

FNDX
3.7%
SCHX
1.8%

Utilities

FNDX
3.2%
SCHX
2.6%

Real Estate

FNDX
1.8%
SCHX
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDXSCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.28

2.45

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.59

3.32

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.44

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

3.31

+2.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.77

15.11

+6.67

FNDX vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDXSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28

2.45

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.80

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.86

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDXSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-34.33%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-9.02%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-19.04%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-25.41%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

-34.33%

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-3.97%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.98%

-0.43%

Volatility

FNDX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 2.37%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDXSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

2.81%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

9.00%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

11.97%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

17.12%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

18.15%

-0.65%

FNDX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.00%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDX and SCHX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to FNDX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.49% vs 14.28% for FNDX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 14.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.00% for SCHX.

FNDX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.03% for SCHX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDX and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer