FNDX vs. SCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX).
FNDX and SCHX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both FNDX and SCHX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDX or SCHX.
Performance
FNDX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 23.03% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 27.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 14.11%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.
FNDX
23.03%
3.67%
13.95%
32.34%
17.98%
14.11%
SCHX
27.78%
3.68%
14.52%
34.56%
17.33%
14.91%
Key characteristics
| FNDX | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.94 | 2.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.01 | 3.71 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.01 | 4.04 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.04 | 18.10 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.70% | 1.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.00% | 12.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.71% | -34.33% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.30% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and SCHX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than SCHX's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 2.50% | 4.59% | 3.97% | 4.90% | 5.81% | 3.20% | 3.43% | 2.75% | 3.94% | 2.01% | 1.62% | 0.60% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.17% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% | 1.76% | 1.65% |
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and SCHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.