PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 14.53%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.


FNDX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.94%
YTD
14.79%
6M
14.33%
1Y
31.80%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
14.53%

VTI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.79%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.35%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and VTI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.92

The correlation between FNDX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDX vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDX
VTI

Technology

22.1%
37.0%

Financial Services

13.3%
11.3%

Healthcare

11.9%
9.0%

Communication Services

9.9%
9.8%

Energy

9.3%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.7%

Industrials

9.1%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.9%

Utilities

3.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.3%

Technology

FNDX
22.1%
VTI
37.0%

Financial Services

FNDX
13.3%
VTI
11.3%

Healthcare

FNDX
11.9%
VTI
9.0%

Communication Services

FNDX
9.9%
VTI
9.8%

Energy

FNDX
9.3%
VTI
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDX
9.1%
VTI
9.7%

Industrials

FNDX
9.1%
VTI
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

FNDX
7.0%
VTI
4.3%

Basic Materials

FNDX
3.6%
VTI
1.9%

Utilities

FNDX
3.0%
VTI
2.1%

Real Estate

FNDX
1.7%
VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDXVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.38

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

3.06

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.40

13.68

+6.72

FNDX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-55.45%

+17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-8.92%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-19.30%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-25.36%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

-35.00%

-2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.48%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-8.01%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.99%

-0.43%

Volatility

FNDX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 3.29%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.74%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

9.96%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

12.76%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

17.49%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

18.35%

-0.83%

FNDX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than VTI's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDX and VTI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to FNDX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.31% vs 14.53% for FNDX. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.02% for VTI.

FNDX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.03% for VTI.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer