FNDX vs. VTI
FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDX returned 14.53%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
FNDX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 14.53%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 27.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
FNDX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.79% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 17.12% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 10.35% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and VTI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FNDX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDX vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDX
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FNDX
VTI
Financial Services
FNDX
VTI
Healthcare
FNDX
VTI
Communication Services
FNDX
VTI
Energy
FNDX
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
FNDX
VTI
Industrials
FNDX
VTI
Consumer Defensive
FNDX
VTI
Basic Materials
FNDX
VTI
Utilities
FNDX
VTI
Real Estate
FNDX
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
VTI
FNDX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.38 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 3.06 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.40 | 13.68 | +6.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -55.45% | +17.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | -8.92% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -19.30% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | -25.36% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | -35.00% | -2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -1.48% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -8.01% | +4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.99% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FNDX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 3.29%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 4.74% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 9.96% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 12.76% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 17.49% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 18.35% | -0.83% |
FNDX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than VTI's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDX and VTI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to FNDX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.31% vs 14.53% for FNDX. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.31% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.02% for VTI.
FNDX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.03% for VTI.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDX and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer