WZRD vs. FMAY

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

WZRD (Opportunistic Trader ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - WZRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Opportunistic Trader, while FMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. Over the past year, WZRD returned -90.52% vs 12.68% for FMAY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WZRD charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.

Performance

WZRD vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WZRD achieves a -89.20% return, which is significantly lower than FMAY's 5.87% return.

WZRD

• 1D: -6.30%
• 1M: -58.43%
• 6M: -88.82%
• YTD: -89.20%
• 1Y: -90.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAY

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: 5.26%
• YTD: 5.87%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WZRD vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	-89.20%	-18.13%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	5.87%	7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between WZRD and FMAY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

WZRD vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WZRD

WZRD Risk / Return Rank: 0
WZRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
WZRD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 79
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WZRD vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WZRD	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.26	1.91	-3.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.16	2.75	-5.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.55	1.39	-0.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	2.95	-3.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.24	15.23	-17.47

WZRD vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WZRD Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WZRD and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WZRD vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WZRD drawdown since its inception was -91.23%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WZRD and FMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	WZRD	FMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.23%	-13.60%	-77.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-91.23%	-4.22%	-87.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.23%	0.00%	-91.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.79%	-1.99%	-27.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.28%	0.82%	+39.46%

Volatility

WZRD vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD) has a higher volatility of 55.27% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 2.73%. This indicates that WZRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WZRD	FMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	55.27%	2.73%	+52.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	71.03%	5.53%	+65.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.62%	6.53%	+65.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.67%	10.66%	+60.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.67%	10.15%	+60.52%

WZRD vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WZRD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

WZRD vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

WZRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.92%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%
WZRD Opportunistic Trader ETF	11.92%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WZRD and FMAY in my portfolio?

WZRD and FMAY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WZRD or FMAY?

WZRD has higher volatility (55.27%) compared to FMAY (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WZRD dropped -91.23% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, WZRD or FMAY?

On 1-year performance, FMAY leads with 12.68% vs -90.52% for WZRD. On fees, FMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WZRD or FMAY?

Over the 1-year period, FMAY has performed better with a 12.68% return vs -90.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WZRD or FMAY?

FMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WZRD or FMAY?

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 11.92%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

What is the main difference between WZRD and FMAY?

WZRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FMAY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Opportunistic Trader and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WZRD and 0.85% for FMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.