PortfoliosLab logo
FMAY vs. BUFR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FMAY and BUFR is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FMAY vs. BUFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FMAY:

0.88

BUFR:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

FMAY:

1.27

BUFR:

1.03

Omega Ratio

FMAY:

1.19

BUFR:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

FMAY:

0.83

BUFR:

0.63

Martin Ratio

FMAY:

3.44

BUFR:

2.66

Ulcer Index

FMAY:

3.18%

BUFR:

3.02%

Daily Std Dev

FMAY:

13.15%

BUFR:

11.70%

Max Drawdown

FMAY:

-13.60%

BUFR:

-13.73%

Current Drawdown

FMAY:

-0.72%

BUFR:

-1.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than BUFR's 0.98% return.


FMAY

YTD

2.26%

1M

6.34%

6M

1.59%

1Y

11.49%

3Y*

10.00%

5Y*

8.98%

10Y*

N/A

BUFR

YTD

0.98%

1M

4.55%

6M

0.52%

1Y

8.38%

3Y*

10.88%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs

FMAY vs. BUFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFR's 1.05% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMAY vs. BUFR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMAY is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMAY is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMAY is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMAY is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMAY is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMAY is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BUFR is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BUFR is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BUFR is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BUFR is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BUFR is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BUFR is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FMAY vs. BUFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FMAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the BUFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAY and BUFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FMAY vs. BUFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMAY nor BUFR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FMAY vs. BUFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFR drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and BUFR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FMAY vs. BUFR - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs (BUFR) at 3.32%. This indicates that FMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...