FMAY vs. SPY
FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMAY returned 9.27%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
FMAY vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return.
FMAY
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
FMAY vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May | 4.83% | 12.69% | 14.45% | 17.83% | -8.08% | 11.00% | 10.80% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 32.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMAY and SPY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FMAY and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FMAY vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMAY
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FMAY
SPY
Financial Services
FMAY
SPY
Communication Services
FMAY
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
FMAY
SPY
Healthcare
FMAY
SPY
Industrials
FMAY
SPY
Consumer Defensive
FMAY
SPY
Energy
FMAY
SPY
Utilities
FMAY
SPY
Real Estate
FMAY
SPY
Basic Materials
FMAY
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMAY vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FMAY
SPY
FMAY vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMAY | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.01 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.92 | 13.54 | +5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMAY vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMAY | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -55.19% | +41.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.22% | -8.88% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.12% | -18.76% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.60% | -24.50% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -1.75% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -9.04% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 1.97% | -1.19% |
Volatility
FMAY vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) is 3.00%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that FMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMAY | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 4.64% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.36% | 9.75% | -4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.50% | 12.43% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.65% | 17.14% | -6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 17.99% | -7.82% |
FMAY vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMAY vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FMAY and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to FMAY (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAY dropped -13.60% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.51% vs 9.27% for FMAY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.
FMAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FMAY and 0.09% for SPY.
FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMAY and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer