WQTM vs. GINN
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WQTM is actively managed, while GINN is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.
Performance
WQTM vs. GINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 46.02% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 5.00% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 46.02%
- 6M
- 40.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GINN
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.45%
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 46.02% | -13.35% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 5.00% | -2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and GINN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GINN
WQTM vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WQTM | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and GINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -41.25% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -4.93% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -13.28% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.75% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.37% | 16.57% | +26.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 21.44% | +21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.37% | 21.07% | +22.30% |
WQTM vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.20% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and GINN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.
GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.50% for GINN.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and GINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer