PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WQTM vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WQTM vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WQTM having a 53.55% return and QTUM slightly lower at 53.29%.


WQTM

1D
-3.80%
1M
23.76%
YTD
53.55%
6M
48.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQTM vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WQTM
WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund
53.55%-14.56%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.29%-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WQTM and QTUM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WQTM vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQTM

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQTM vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WQTM vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WQTMQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

1.08

+0.18

Drawdowns

WQTM vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WQTMQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-38.45%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-0.59%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-8.25%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

Volatility

WQTM vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WQTMQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.98%

26.26%

+15.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.98%

26.56%

+15.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.98%

27.17%

+14.81%

WQTM vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WQTM vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%
WQTM
WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, WQTM and QTUM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.40% for QTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WQTM and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer