WQTM vs. DRAM
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
WQTM vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WQTM
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -7.87%
- 6M
- 20.66%
- YTD
- 26.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DRAM
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.29B | $4.47B | $3.58B | |
| $7.42M | $7.41M | $15.89M |
WQTM vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 31.72% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 89.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and DRAM is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum DRAM drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -44.44% | +14.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -36.66% | +15.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -10.81% | -1.77% |
Volatility
WQTM vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.89% | 100.35% | -56.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.89% | 100.35% | -56.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.89% | 100.35% | -56.46% |
WQTM vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
Neither WQTM nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and DRAM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
WQTM and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.65% for DRAM.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer