WQTM vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

WQTM vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WQTM

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 46.02%
• 6M: 40.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: -14.25%
• 1M: 31.05%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQTM vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund	51.95%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	156.37%

Correlation

The correlation between WQTM and DRAM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.68

Return for Risk

WQTM vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

WQTM vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	WQTM	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-19.97%	-6.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.52%	-14.25%	+5.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.57%	-3.09%	-8.48%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WQTM	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.37%	93.22%	-49.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.37%	93.22%	-49.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.37%	93.22%	-49.85%

WQTM vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQTM vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither WQTM nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WQTM and DRAM in my portfolio?

WQTM and DRAM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WQTM or DRAM?

On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WQTM or DRAM?

WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WQTM or DRAM?

WQTM and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WQTM and DRAM?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.65% for DRAM.