WQTM vs. CQTM

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CQTM.

Performance

WQTM vs. CQTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WQTM

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -5.11%
• 6M: 23.48%
• YTD: 34.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CQTM

• 1D: -3.41%
• 1M: -5.12%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQTM vs. CQTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund	5.27%
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	-1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between WQTM and CQTM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

WQTM vs. CQTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

WQTM vs. CQTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than CQTM's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and CQTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	WQTM	CQTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-21.53%	-4.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.86%	-21.53%	+5.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.65%	-8.90%	-2.75%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WQTM	CQTM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.13%	86.48%	-43.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.13%	86.48%	-43.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.13%	86.48%	-43.35%

WQTM vs. CQTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CQTM's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQTM vs. CQTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither WQTM nor CQTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WQTM and CQTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, WQTM and CQTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WQTM or CQTM?

On fees, CQTM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WQTM or CQTM?

CQTM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WQTM or CQTM?

WQTM and CQTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WQTM and CQTM?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Corgi Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.35% for CQTM.