WPP vs. VOO
WPP (WPP plc) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, WPP returned -11.55%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for VOO. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
WPP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WPP achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, WPP has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -11.55%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.
WPP
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 23.11%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -20.17%
- 3Y*
- -22.66%
- 5Y*
- -16.75%
- 10Y*
- -11.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.74%
VOO
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.97B | $3.80B | $5.49B | |
WPP WPP plc | $8.02M | $7.51M | $8.66M |
WPP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPP WPP plc | -6.85% | -53.53% | 13.55% | 1.49% | -31.96% | 43.52% | -17.24% | 36.53% | -36.30% | -14.98% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPP and VOO is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WPP and VOO has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WPP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
WPP
VOO
WPP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WPP plc (WPP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WPP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.63 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 11.23 | -12.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WPP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WPP drawdown since its inception was -95.30%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPP and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.30% | -33.99% | -61.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.42% | -8.90% | -34.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.59% | -18.69% | -52.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.69% | -24.52% | -53.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.99% | -33.99% | -46.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.29% | 0.00% | -72.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -3.67% | -38.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.38% | 2.08% | +24.30% |
Volatility
WPP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
WPP plc (WPP) has a higher volatility of 17.15% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that WPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WPP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.15% | 3.81% | +13.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.73% | 10.18% | +26.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.62% | 12.80% | +35.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.93% | 16.95% | +18.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.43% | 18.02% | +17.41% |
Dividends
WPP vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
WPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
WPP WPP plc | 4.97% | 9.09% | 4.85% | 5.09% | 4.38% | 2.45% | 5.66% | 5.47% | 7.35% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WPP and VOO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WPP has higher volatility (17.15%) compared to VOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPP dropped -95.30% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WPP and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer