WPP vs. RPXIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WPP plc (WPP) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX).

RPXIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 2010.

Performance

WPP vs. RPXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WPP plc (WPP) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WPP vs. RPXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WPP WPP plc	-30.77%	-53.53%	13.55%	1.49%	-31.96%	43.52%	-17.24%	36.53%	-36.30%	-14.98%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	-13.34%	13.18%	22.55%	51.57%	-47.37%	1.09%	55.28%	32.49%	-4.78%	30.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPP achieves a -30.77% return, which is significantly lower than RPXIX's -13.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WPP has underperformed RPXIX with an annualized return of -14.17%, while RPXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.

WPP

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -16.40%
• YTD: -30.77%
• 6M: -36.57%
• 1Y: -56.44%
• 3Y*: -32.60%
• 5Y*: -21.33%
• 10Y*: -14.17%

RPXIX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -8.04%
• YTD: -13.34%
• 6M: -12.24%
• 1Y: 5.71%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: -1.11%
• 10Y*: 10.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WPP vs. RPXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPP

WPP Risk / Return Rank: 5
WPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
WPP Omega Ratio Rank: 3
WPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WPP Martin Ratio Rank: 9

RPXIX

RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPP vs. RPXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WPP plc (WPP) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WPP	RPXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.18	0.28	-1.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.77	0.56	-2.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.08	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	0.20	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	0.71	-2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WPP vs. RPXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPP Sharpe Ratio is -1.18, which is lower than the RPXIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPP and RPXIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WPP	RPXIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.18	0.28	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.62	-0.04	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.41	0.41	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	0.46	-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between WPP and RPXIX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WPP vs. RPXIX - Dividend Comparison

WPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.13%, more than RPXIX's 10.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WPP WPP plc	13.13%	9.09%	4.85%	5.09%	4.38%	2.45%	5.66%	5.47%	7.35%	4.32%	3.01%	2.81%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	10.56%	9.15%	7.22%	0.00%	0.01%	3.79%	6.69%	11.76%	15.17%	9.01%	0.54%	1.72%

Drawdowns

WPP vs. RPXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPP drawdown since its inception was -95.30%, which is greater than RPXIX's maximum drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPP and RPXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WPP	RPXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.30%	-58.56%	-36.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.46%	-15.28%	-45.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.69%	-58.56%	-19.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.99%	-58.56%	-21.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.40%	-20.17%	-59.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.33%	-11.64%	-30.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.21%	4.30%	+32.91%

Volatility

WPP vs. RPXIX - Volatility Comparison

WPP plc (WPP) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) at 4.87%. This indicates that WPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WPP	RPXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.60%	4.87%	+8.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.12%	10.79%	+28.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.98%	21.14%	+26.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	26.37%	+7.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.79%	24.71%	+10.08%