WPP vs. ACN

In the year-to-date period, WPP achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than ACN's -16.40% return. Over the past 10 years, WPP has underperformed ACN with an annualized return of -6.87%, while ACN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.89% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WPP plc (WPP) and Accenture plc (ACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WPP Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the ACN Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPP and ACN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than ACN's 1.97% yield.

The maximum WPP drawdown since its inception was -95.77%, which is greater than ACN's maximum drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPP and ACN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

WPP plc (WPP) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Accenture plc (ACN) at 12.13%. This indicates that WPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WPP plc and Accenture plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.