WPP vs. XOM
WPP (WPP plc) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. WPP operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, WPP returned -11.55%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for XOM. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WPP vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WPP achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 30.59% return. Over the past 10 years, WPP has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of -11.55%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.
WPP
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 23.11%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -20.17%
- 3Y*
- -22.66%
- 5Y*
- -16.75%
- 10Y*
- -11.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.74%
XOM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 13.11%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 30.59%
- 1Y
- 45.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 26.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
WPP WPP plc | $8.02M | $7.51M | $8.66M |
| $2.21B | $2.17B | $2.47B |
WPP vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPP WPP plc | -6.85% | -53.53% | 13.55% | 1.49% | -31.96% | 43.52% | -17.24% | 36.53% | -36.30% | -14.98% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 30.59% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPP and XOM is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.27 |
The correlation between WPP and XOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WPP:
$4.39B
XOM:
$642.60B
WPP:
£1.52
XOM:
$7.74
WPP:
9.92
XOM:
20.03
WPP:
0.13
XOM:
0.93
WPP:
0.11
XOM:
1.82
WPP:
1.28
XOM:
2.50
WPP:
£28.29B
XOM:
$361.06B
WPP:
£4.60B
XOM:
$90.79B
WPP:
£2.22B
XOM:
$70.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WPP vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
WPP
XOM
WPP vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WPP plc (WPP) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WPP | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.31 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.29 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 5.82 | -6.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WPP vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WPP drawdown since its inception was -95.30%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPP and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPP | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.30% | -62.40% | -32.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.42% | -20.11% | -23.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.59% | -20.11% | -51.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.69% | -20.51% | -57.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.99% | -61.01% | -18.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.29% | -8.96% | -63.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -10.22% | -32.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.38% | 7.93% | +18.45% |
Volatility
WPP vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
WPP plc (WPP) has a higher volatility of 17.15% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 7.57%. This indicates that WPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WPP | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.15% | 7.57% | +9.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.73% | 20.70% | +16.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.62% | 24.99% | +23.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.93% | 26.66% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.43% | 28.29% | +7.14% |
Dividends
WPP vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
WPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than XOM's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPP WPP plc | 4.97% | 9.09% | 4.85% | 5.09% | 4.38% | 2.45% | 5.66% | 5.47% | 7.35% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.81% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.63% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
WPP vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WPP plc and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WPP vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
WPP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WPP plc reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 6.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 25.63B and revenue of 114.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.4%.
WPP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WPP plc reported an operating income of 161.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 18.20B and revenue of 114.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.
WPP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WPP plc reported a net income of -259.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 14.53B and revenue of 114.53B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WPP and XOM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WPP has higher volatility (17.15%) compared to XOM (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPP dropped -95.30% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WPP and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer