WMBFX vs. EKWAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WMBFX (Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund) and EKWAX (Allspring Precious Metals Fund) are both mutual funds - WMBFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Allspring, while EKWAX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Allspring. Over the past 10 years, WMBFX returned 5.12%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for EKWAX. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WMBFX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for EKWAX.

Performance

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMBFX achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than EKWAX's -9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WMBFX has underperformed EKWAX with an annualized return of 5.12%, while EKWAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.

WMBFX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -1.71%
• 6M: 1.73%
• YTD: 4.67%
• 1Y: 11.95%
• 3Y*: 8.58%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 5.12%
• ALL TIME*: 3.79%

EKWAX

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -2.85%
• 6M: -16.24%
• YTD: -9.10%
• 1Y: 52.40%
• 3Y*: 42.22%
• 5Y*: 22.63%
• 10Y*: 11.51%
• ALL TIME*: 10.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WMBFX Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMBFX Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund	4.67%	11.39%	6.59%	9.45%	-15.07%	7.64%	14.95%	13.72%	-5.67%	10.27%
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	-9.10%	163.65%	21.28%	8.83%	-7.75%	-11.00%	24.40%	40.35%	-12.83%	9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WMBFX and EKWAX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	0.30

Over the past year, WMBFX and EKWAX have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

WMBFX vs. EKWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WMBFX

WMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 46
WMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
WMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
WMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
WMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

EKWAX

EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 35
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMBFX	EKWAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.17	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.61	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.22	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	1.46	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	3.22	+3.43

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the EKWAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMBFX and EKWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, smaller than the maximum EKWAX drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBFX and EKWAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMBFX	EKWAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.15%	-76.76%	+57.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.36%	-37.42%	+33.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.03%	-37.42%	+31.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.15%	-42.79%	+23.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.15%	-49.23%	+30.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.44%	-32.40%	+28.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-32.76%	+28.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	16.97%	-15.34%

Volatility

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) is 2.92%, while Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a volatility of 12.54%. This indicates that WMBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMBFX	EKWAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	12.54%	-9.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.70%	38.76%	-32.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.55%	46.78%	-38.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.76%	34.41%	-26.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.27%	33.38%	-26.11%

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMBFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EKWAX's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMBFX vs. EKWAX - Dividend Comparison

WMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than EKWAX's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.31%	1.19%	0.84%	0.00%	2.01%	1.35%	1.45%	0.11%	0.00%	1.34%	1.11%
WMBFX Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund	2.17%	2.20%	1.97%	2.60%	5.57%	9.26%	9.32%	2.29%	8.93%	9.55%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMBFX and EKWAX in my portfolio?

WMBFX and EKWAX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WMBFX or EKWAX?

EKWAX has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to WMBFX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMBFX dropped -19.15% vs EKWAX's -76.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WMBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.