EKWAX vs. FRESX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EKWAX (Allspring Precious Metals Fund) and FRESX (Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio) are both mutual funds - EKWAX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while FRESX is a REIT fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX returned 14.90%/yr vs 5.14%/yr for FRESX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EKWAX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FRESX.

Performance

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FRESX's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has outperformed FRESX with an annualized return of 14.90%, while FRESX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.14% annualized return.

EKWAX

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 9.01%
• 1Y: 65.94%
• 3Y*: 46.59%
• 5Y*: 22.61%
• 10Y*: 14.90%

FRESX

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 8.90%
• 1Y: 9.30%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: 5.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.63%	163.65%	21.28%	8.83%	-7.75%	-11.00%	24.40%	40.35%	-12.83%	9.66%
FRESX Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio	9.39%	2.54%	5.87%	10.82%	-24.36%	42.34%	-7.93%	25.22%	-4.48%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EKWAX and FRESX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 1998	0.20

Return for Risk

EKWAX vs. FRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKWAX

EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FRESX

FRESX Risk / Return Rank: 9
FRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EKWAX	FRESX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	0.71	+1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	1.05	+1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.13	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	1.23	+1.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	3.56	+3.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the FRESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and FRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EKWAX	FRESX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	0.71	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.16	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.25	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.38	-0.06

Drawdowns

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FRESX drawdown of -76.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and FRESX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EKWAX	FRESX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.76%	-76.34%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.03%	-7.78%	-21.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.03%	-16.44%	-12.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.79%	-32.13%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.23%	-40.93%	-8.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.42%	-3.34%	-21.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.77%	-11.12%	-21.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.06%	2.69%	+8.37%

Volatility

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio (FRESX) at 3.74%. This indicates that EKWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EKWAX	FRESX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.99%	3.74%	+11.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.71%	9.26%	+26.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.77%	13.29%	+30.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.48%	18.73%	+14.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.21%	20.56%	+12.65%

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FRESX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

EKWAX vs. FRESX - Dividend Comparison

EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FRESX's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.18%	1.19%	0.84%	0.00%	2.01%	1.35%	1.45%	0.11%	0.00%	1.34%	1.11%	0.00%
FRESX Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio	4.24%	4.64%	5.58%	6.95%	10.16%	3.70%	4.77%	6.91%	4.23%	4.00%	4.90%	6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EKWAX and FRESX in my portfolio?

EKWAX and FRESX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EKWAX or FRESX?

EKWAX has higher volatility (14.99%) compared to FRESX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKWAX dropped -76.76% vs FRESX's -76.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EKWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.