EKWAX vs. FSELX

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a 51.89% return, which is significantly higher than FSELX's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.97% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and FSELX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FSELX's 8.81% yield.

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and FSELX.

Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a higher volatility of 13.56% compared to Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) at 9.68%. This indicates that EKWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.