PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMBFX vs. SSHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMBFX achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than SSHIX's 0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, WMBFX has outperformed SSHIX with an annualized return of 5.65%, while SSHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.


WMBFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.18%
YTD
8.40%
6M
8.41%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
5.65%

SSHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMBFX
Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
8.40%11.39%6.59%9.45%-15.07%7.64%14.95%13.72%-5.67%10.27%
SSHIX
Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund
0.61%5.59%5.41%6.19%-4.87%0.16%6.02%4.80%1.41%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between WMBFX and SSHIX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.21

The correlation between WMBFX and SSHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMBFX vs. SSHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMBFX
WMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
WMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHIX
SSHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SSHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMBFXSSHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.86

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

2.99

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

12.80

+0.69

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the SSHIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMBFX and SSHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMBFXSSHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

3.08

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.17

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

1.43

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.56

-1.00

Drawdowns

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, which is greater than SSHIX's maximum drawdown of -7.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBFX and SSHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMBFXSSHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-7.13%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-1.39%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-1.39%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

-7.13%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.15%

-7.13%

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-0.62%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.32%

+1.02%

Volatility

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX) at 0.45%. This indicates that WMBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMBFXSSHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

0.45%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.39%

1.02%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

1.35%

+6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.51%

2.07%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

1.86%

+5.34%

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMBFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SSHIX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMBFX vs. SSHIX - Dividend Comparison

WMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than SSHIX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSHIX
Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund
4.20%4.27%4.43%3.92%1.92%2.31%3.14%2.61%2.21%1.65%1.58%1.70%
WMBFX
Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund
2.03%2.20%1.97%2.60%5.57%9.26%9.32%2.29%8.93%9.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMBFX and SSHIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMBFX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to SSHIX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMBFX dropped -19.15% vs SSHIX's -7.13%.

SSHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMBFX and SSHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer