EKWAX vs. ARKW

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 5.97%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.26% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the ARKW Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and ARKW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither EKWAX nor ARKW has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and ARKW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) is 8.17%, while ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that EKWAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.