EKWAX vs. ARKW

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EKWAX (Allspring Precious Metals Fund) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both funds - EKWAX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Allspring, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX returned 11.51%/yr vs 21.15%/yr for ARKW. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EKWAX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.

Performance

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a -9.10% return, which is significantly lower than ARKW's -7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 11.51%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.15% annualized return.

EKWAX

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -2.85%
• 6M: -16.24%
• YTD: -9.10%
• 1Y: 52.40%
• 3Y*: 42.22%
• 5Y*: 22.63%
• 10Y*: 11.51%
• ALL TIME*: 10.61%

ARKW

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -5.74%
• 6M: -0.05%
• YTD: -7.37%
• 1Y: -7.47%
• 3Y*: 27.92%
• 5Y*: -1.16%
• 10Y*: 21.15%
• ALL TIME*: 19.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	$8.60M	$12.21M	$13.95M
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	-9.10%	163.65%	21.28%	8.83%	-7.75%	-11.00%	24.40%	40.35%	-12.83%	9.66%
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	-7.37%	38.93%	42.27%	96.89%	-67.49%	-18.85%	157.44%	35.76%	4.24%	87.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EKWAX and ARKW is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014	0.17

Over the past year, EKWAX and ARKW have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

EKWAX vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EKWAX

EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 35
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ARKW

ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 7
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EKWAX	ARKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	-0.36	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	-0.29	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.97	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	-0.33	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.22	-0.62	+3.85

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the ARKW Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and ARKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, roughly equal to the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and ARKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EKWAX	ARKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.76%	-80.52%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.42%	-36.21%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.42%	-36.21%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.79%	-77.36%	+34.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.23%	-80.52%	+31.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.40%	-25.76%	-6.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.76%	-23.95%	-8.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.97%	19.34%	-2.37%

Volatility

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) at 8.84%. This indicates that EKWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EKWAX	ARKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.54%	8.84%	+3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.76%	25.86%	+12.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.78%	33.57%	+13.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.41%	43.76%	-9.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.38%	37.82%	-4.44%

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

EKWAX vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison

EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than ARKW's 1.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	1.72%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	1.29%	0.00%	13.05%	2.05%	0.00%	2.29%
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.31%	1.19%	0.84%	0.00%	2.01%	1.35%	1.45%	0.11%	0.00%	1.34%	1.11%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EKWAX and ARKW in my portfolio?

EKWAX and ARKW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EKWAX or ARKW?

EKWAX has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to ARKW (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKWAX dropped -76.76% vs ARKW's -80.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EKWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.