PortfoliosLab logo
EKWAX vs. FSAGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EKWAX and FSAGX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
690.44%
445.98%
EKWAX
FSAGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EKWAX:

2.13

FSAGX:

1.75

Sortino Ratio

EKWAX:

2.88

FSAGX:

2.47

Omega Ratio

EKWAX:

1.38

FSAGX:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

EKWAX:

1.61

FSAGX:

1.08

Martin Ratio

EKWAX:

10.12

FSAGX:

7.40

Ulcer Index

EKWAX:

6.97%

FSAGX:

7.76%

Daily Std Dev

EKWAX:

30.75%

FSAGX:

30.45%

Max Drawdown

EKWAX:

-77.82%

FSAGX:

-77.21%

Current Drawdown

EKWAX:

-2.46%

FSAGX:

-24.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a 52.93% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's 49.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has outperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 11.26%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.


EKWAX

YTD

52.93%

1M

15.50%

6M

38.30%

1Y

64.70%

5Y*

11.58%

10Y*

11.26%

FSAGX

YTD

49.72%

1M

13.76%

6M

35.06%

1Y

52.79%

5Y*

6.85%

10Y*

8.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAGX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EKWAX vs. FSAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKWAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EKWAX is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EKWAX is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EKWAX is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EKWAX is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EKWAX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EKWAX is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSAGX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSAGX is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and FSAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.13
1.75
EKWAX
FSAGX

Dividends

EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FSAGX's 2.30% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
EKWAX
Allspring Precious Metals Fund
0.55%0.84%0.00%2.01%1.35%1.45%0.11%0.00%1.34%1.11%
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
2.30%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.59%4.40%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, roughly equal to the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and FSAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-2.46%
-24.63%
EKWAX
FSAGX

Volatility

EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) have volatilities of 11.90% and 11.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.90%
11.63%
EKWAX
FSAGX