Correlation
The correlation between EKWAX and FSAGX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
EKWAX vs. FSAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX).
EKWAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998. FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EKWAX or FSAGX.
Performance
EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
EKWAX:
1.99
FSAGX:
1.67
EKWAX:
2.49
FSAGX:
2.17
EKWAX:
1.33
FSAGX:
1.29
EKWAX:
1.53
FSAGX:
0.98
EKWAX:
8.98
FSAGX:
6.70
EKWAX:
7.00%
FSAGX:
7.78%
EKWAX:
31.86%
FSAGX:
31.50%
EKWAX:
-76.76%
FSAGX:
-77.21%
EKWAX:
-1.30%
FSAGX:
-24.81%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EKWAX having a 51.89% return and FSAGX slightly lower at 49.35%. Over the past 10 years, EKWAX has outperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.07% annualized return.
EKWAX
51.89%
4.76%
41.26%
62.72%
22.77%
11.59%
11.57%
FSAGX
49.35%
3.12%
38.87%
51.92%
14.76%
7.31%
9.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAGX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EKWAX vs. FSAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EKWAX
FSAGX
EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison
EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FSAGX's 2.31% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund | 0.55% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 1.11% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 2.31% | 3.62% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.60% | 4.40% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 3.57% |
Drawdowns
EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and FSAGX.
Loading data...
Volatility
EKWAX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) have volatilities of 13.56% and 13.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...