WM vs. BAC
WM (Waste Management, Inc.) and BAC (Bank of America Corporation) are both stocks. WM operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while BAC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WM returned 15.36%/yr vs 18.19%/yr for BAC. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WM vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than BAC's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, WM has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 15.36%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.19% annualized return.
WM
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- -5.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
BAC
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
WM vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 0.71% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3.72% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WM and BAC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1991 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WM and BAC has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
WM:
$88.75B
BAC:
$415.53B
WM:
$6.91
BAC:
$4.19
WM:
31.76
BAC:
13.36
WM:
2.60
BAC:
5.36
WM:
3.49
BAC:
2.42
WM:
8.86
BAC:
1.51
WM:
$25.41B
BAC:
$174.85B
WM:
$5.61B
BAC:
$110.47B
WM:
$6.96B
BAC:
$41.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WM vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
WM
BAC
WM vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WM | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.24 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 1.64 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 4.21 | -5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WM vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WM | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.85% | -93.10% | +15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.70% | -17.93% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -27.51% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -46.64% | +28.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | -48.95% | +18.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.24% | -0.36% | -9.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.69% | -28.30% | +10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 6.96% | +0.62% |
Volatility
WM vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.49%. This indicates that WM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WM | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 5.49% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | 16.57% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 21.62% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 26.89% | -8.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 30.68% | -11.14% |
Dividends
WM vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than BAC's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.72% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
WM vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WM vs. BAC - Profitability Comparison
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
BAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
BAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WM and BAC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WM has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WM dropped -77.85% vs BAC's -93.10%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WM and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer